Le 04/10/2011 23:41, Georg Brandl a écrit : > I don't understand this change. Why would you not always add "copied" once you > already have it? It seems to be the more correct version anyway. If you use copied instead of seplen/itemlen, you suppose that the string has been overallocated in some cases, and that you have to resize the string (in-place or, more probably, with a copy). Victor
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4