On Sun, Oct 2, 2011 at 7:23 PM, Simon Cross <hodgestar+pythondev at gmail.com> wrote: > I'm -1 on hacking += to be fast again because having the two loops > below perform wildly differently is *very* surprising to me: > > s = '' > for x in loops: > s += x > > s = '' > for x in loops: > s = s + x Erk. Bad example. Second example should be: s = '' for x in loops: b = s s += x (I misunderstood the details but I new the reference counting hackiness would lead to surprises somewhere :). Schiavo Simon
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4