On Sat, Oct 1, 2011 at 7:17 PM, Victor Stinner <victor.stinner at haypocalc.com> wrote: > I'm writing this email to ask you if this type solves a real issue, or if we > can just prove the super-fast str.join(list of str). I'm -1 on hacking += to be fast again because having the two loops below perform wildly differently is *very* surprising to me: s = '' for x in loops: s += x s = '' for x in loops: s = s + x Schiavo Simon
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4