Antoine Pitrou writes: > I'm not sure why "StringStream" or "StringBuffer" would be more > discoverable, unless you're coming from a language where these names are > well-known. I think they are, but it doesn't really matter, since both are a bit lame, and I doubt either is sufficiently suggestive to be worth changing the name of the module, or even providing an alias. I wish I had a better name to offer, that's all. > I personally like the relative tersity of "StringIO". The issue is not that I *dislike* the name; I *personally* like the name fine. It's that it's definitely not doing anything to reduce the frequency of the "efficient string concatenation" FAQ.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4