On Sat, 1 Oct 2011 22:06:11 +0200 Victor Stinner <victor.stinner at haypocalc.com> wrote: > > > I'm writing this email to ask you if this type solves a real issue, or if > > we can just prove the super-fast str.join(list of str). > > Hum, it looks like "What is the most efficient string concatenation method in > python?" in a frequently asked question. There is a recent thread on python- > ideas mailing list: So, since people are confused at the number of possible options, you propose to add a new option and therefore increase the confusion? I don't understand why StringIO couldn't simply be optimized a little more, if it needs to. Or, if straightforward string concatenation really needs to be fast, then str + str should be optimized (like it used to be). Regards Antoine.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4