RetroSearch Browse

Wed Nov 30 17:52:17 CET 2011 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2011-November/114709.html

Hi,

Thanks for the replies.

> At this point, though, before doing any more work on the PEP I'd
> like to have some idea of whether there's any chance of it being accepted.
>  At this point, there seems to be a lot of passive, "Usenet nod syndrome"
> type support for it, but little active support.
If this helps, I am +1, and I’m sure other devs will chime in.  I think
the feature is useful, and I prefer 402’s way to 382’s pyp directories.
 I do acknowledge that 402 poses problems to PEP 395 which 382 does not,
and as I’m not in a position to help, my vote may count less.

Cheers

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2011-November/114709.html below:

[Python-Dev] PEP 402: Simplified Package Layout and Partitioning