RetroSearch Browse

Fri Nov 25 16:50:25 CET 2011 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2011-November/114647.html

On 25/11/2011 15:48, Paul Moore wrote:
> On 25 November 2011 15:07, Amaury Forgeot d'Arc<amauryfa at gmail.com>  wrote:
>> 2011/11/25 Paul Moore<p.f.moore at gmail.com>
>>> It would be nice to have the optimisation back if it's easy enough to
>>> do so, for quick-and-dirty code, but it is not a good idea to rely on
>>> it (and it's especially unwise to base benchmarks on it working :-))
>> Note that this string optimization hack is still present in Python 3,
>> but it now acts on *unicode* strings, not bytes.
> Ah, yes. That makes sense.

Although for concatenating immutable bytes presumably the same hack 
would be *possible*.

Michael
> Paul
> _______________________________________________
> Python-Dev mailing list
> Python-Dev at python.org
> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
> Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/fuzzyman%40voidspace.org.uk
>

-- 
http://www.voidspace.org.uk/

May you do good and not evil
May you find forgiveness for yourself and forgive others
May you share freely, never taking more than you give.
-- the sqlite blessing http://www.sqlite.org/different.html

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2011-November/114647.html below:

[Python-Dev] file.readinto performance regression in Python 3.2 vs. 2.7?