A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2011-November/114624.html below:

[Python-Dev] file.readinto performance regression in Python 3.2 vs. 2.7?

[Python-Dev] file.readinto performance regression in Python 3.2 vs. 2.7?Matt Joiner anacrolix at gmail.com
Fri Nov 25 01:49:19 CET 2011
Eli,

Example coming shortly, the differences are quite significant.

On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 9:41 AM, Eli Bendersky <eliben at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 00:02, Matt Joiner <anacrolix at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> What if you broke up the read and built the final string object up. I
>> always assumed this is where the real gain was with read_into.
>
> Matt, I'm not sure what you mean by this - can you suggest the code?
>
> Also, I'd be happy to know if anyone else reproduces this as well on other
> machines/OSes.
>
> Eli
>
>
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4