Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2011-November/114623.html below:

[Python-Dev] file.readinto performance regression in Python 3.2 vs. 2.7?

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] file.readinto performance regression in Python 3.2 vs. 2.7?
• Next message: [Python-Dev] file.readinto performance regression in Python 3.2 vs. 2.7?
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On 11/24/2011 5:02 PM, Matt Joiner wrote:
> What if you broke up the read and built the final string object up. I
> always assumed this is where the real gain was with read_into.

If a pure read takes twice as long in 3.3 as in 3.2, that is a concern 
regardless of whether there is a better way.

-- 
Terry Jan Reedy

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] file.readinto performance regression in Python 3.2 vs. 2.7?
• Next message: [Python-Dev] file.readinto performance regression in Python 3.2 vs. 2.7?
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4