On 11/22/2011 3:28 PM, Philip Jenvey wrote: > One reason to target 3.2 for now is it's not a moving target. Neither is the basic design and behavior of the new unicode implementation. On 3.2 narrow builds, including Windows >>> len('\U00010101') 2 With 3.3, the answer will be, properly, 1. I suspect that becoming compatible with that, and all that it implies for many other examples, will be the biggest hurdle for PyPy becoming compatible with 3.3. -- Terry Jan Reedy
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4