A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2011-November/114524.html below:

[Python-Dev] patch metadata - to use or not to use?

[Python-Dev] patch metadata - to use or not to use? [Python-Dev] patch metadata - to use or not to use?Petri Lehtinen petri at digip.org
Sat Nov 19 20:41:13 CET 2011
Nick Coghlan wrote:
> Generally speaking, it's more useful for the checkin metadata to
> reflect who actually did the checkin, since that's the most useful
> information for the tracker and buildbot integration.

At least in git, the commit metadata contains both author and
committer (at least if they differ). Maybe mercurial has this too?
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4