A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2011-November/114518.html below:

[Python-Dev] patch metadata - to use or not to use?

[Python-Dev] patch metadata - to use or not to use? [Python-Dev] patch metadata - to use or not to use?Stefan Behnel stefan_ml at behnel.de
Sat Nov 19 09:42:49 CET 2011
Hi,

I recently got some patches accepted for inclusion in 3.3, and each time, 
the patch metadata (such as my name and my commit comment) were stripped by 
applying the patch manually, instead of hg importing it. This makes it 
clear in the history who eventually reviewed and applied the patch, but 
less visible who wrote it (except for the entry in Misc/NEWS).

I didn't see this mentioned in the dev-guide. Is it being considered the 
Right Way To Do It?

Stefan

More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4