Nick Coghlan <ncoghlan at gmail.com> wrote: > > With slices or the new casts (See: http://bugs.python.org/issue5231, > > implemented in http://hg.python.org/features/pep-3118#memoryview ), > > it is possible to have different hashes for equal objects: > > Note that Antoine isn't suggesting that the underlying hash be *used* > as the memoryview's hash (that would be calculated according to the > same rules as the equality comparison). Instead, the ability to hash > the underlying object would just gate whether or not you could hash > the memoryview at all. I think they necessarily have to use the same hash, since: exporter = m1 ==> hash(exporter) = hash(m1) m1 = m2 ==> hash(m1) = hash(m2) Am I missing something? Stefan Krah
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4