> After a quick search on Google codesearch (before it disappears!), I don't > think that "encoding" a Unicode string to its internal PEP-393 representation > would satisfy any program. It looks like wchar_t* is a better candidate. Ok. Making it Py_UNICODE, documenting that, and deprecating the encoding sounds fine to me as well. Regards, Martin
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4