On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 4:51 AM, Terry Reedy <tjreedy at udel.edu> wrote: > If a bug is fixed in 3.2.latest, then it will not be new in 3.3.0, so > perhaps it should not be added there. NEWS could just refer back to previous > sections. Then 3.3.0 News would only be new features and the occasional > ambiguous item not fixed before. The 3.2.x maintenance release sections are not present in the 3.3 NEWS file - it jumps straight from 3.2 to 3.3a1. So bug fixes should be recorded in both places - the 3.3a1 notes record the deltas against 3.2.0, not against whatever the latest release of 3.2 happens to be when 3.3 is released. Cheers, Nick. -- Nick Coghlan | ncoghlan at gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4