On 11/4/2011 3:39 AM, "Martin v. Löwis" wrote: >> Is it worth the hassle? We can just port our existing error handlers, >> and I guess the few third-party error handlers written in C (if any) >> can bear the transition. > > That was my question exactly. As the author of PEP 393, I was leaning > towards full backwards compatibility, but you, Victor, and Guido tell > me not to worry - so I won't :-) While we need to keep the old api, I do not think we do not need to encourage its continued use by actively supporting it with new code. When 3.3 comes out, I think it should be socially OK to write C code only for 3.3+ by only using the new api. -- Terry Jan Reedy
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4