On 5/25/2011 1:09 AM, Nick Coghlan wrote: > The more important feature here is that it is exposing *OpenSSL's* > random number generation, rather than our own. I agree, thought from a different stance, I think. The issue is whether we should 'automatically' expose everything is a wrapped library, even if it duplicates existing functions. I think not. But in this case, at least one of the two functions is sufficiently different, and the newest doc patches clarify the situation. -- Terry Jan Reedy
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4