On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 15:41, Barry Warsaw <barry at python.org> wrote: > I think it would be a nice feature, and I can see the conflict. OT1H you want > to keep os.chown() a thin wrapper, but OTOH you'd rather not have to add a > new, arguably more difficult to discover, function. Given those two choices, > I still think I'd come down on adding a new function and shutil.chown() seems > an appropriate place for it. Right. Please add a mention of shutil.chown() to the os.chown() docs, though. Cheers, Dirkjan
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4