RetroSearch Browse

Wed May 25 12:54:22 CEST 2011 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2011-May/111648.html

> Victor Stinner wrote:
>> I already patched the doc of the random module to add a security
>> warning. Well, you don't really need to know how a CSPRNG is
>> implemented, just that random cannot be used for security and that
>> ssl.RAND_bytes() raises an error if was seeded with enough data.
>>
>> Tell me if my warning is not clear:
>>
>> .. warning::
>>
>>    The generators of the :mod:`random` module should not be used for
>>    security purposes, they are not cryptographic. Use ssl.RAND_bytes()
>>    if you require a cryptographically secure pseudorandom number
>>    generator.
>
> Looks good to me. Regarding style, you should probably make a link,
> like :func:`ssl.RAND_bytes()`.

Does "are not cryptographic" have any meaning? (I'm not an expert, just
not sure). Should it not be "cryptographically secure", to match the next
sentence?

Eric.

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2011-May/111648.html below:

[Python-Dev] [Python-checkins] cpython: Issue #12049: Add RAND_bytes() and RAND_pseudo_bytes() functions to the ssl