A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2011-May/111586.html below:

[Python-Dev] Python 3.x and bytes

[Python-Dev] Python 3.x and bytes [Python-Dev] Python 3.x and bytesTerry Reedy tjreedy at udel.edu
Mon May 23 19:55:41 CEST 2011
On 5/23/2011 1:20 PM, Ethan Furman wrote:
> Glyph Lefkowitz wrote:
>> In fact, I feel like I would want to push in the opposite direction:
>> don't treat one-byte bytes slices less like integers; I wish I could
>> more easily treat n-byte sequences _more_ like integers! :). More
>> protocols have 2-byte or 4-byte network-endian packed integers
>> embedded in them than have individual tag bytes that I want to examine.
>
> So are you thinking that bytes([01,56])[:2] == 120 ? Or more along the
> lines of a .to_int() method?

I believe that such things can be handled by the struct module.

-- 
Terry Jan Reedy

More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4