Glyph Lefkowitz wrote: > In fact, I feel like I would want to push in the opposite direction: > don't treat one-byte bytes slices less like integers; I wish I could > more easily treat n-byte sequences _more_ like integers! :). More > protocols have 2-byte or 4-byte network-endian packed integers embedded > in them than have individual tag bytes that I want to examine. So are you thinking that bytes([01,56])[:2] == 120 ? Or more along the lines of a .to_int() method? ~Ethan~
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4