A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2011-May/111466.html below:

[Python-Dev] Python 3.x and bytes

[Python-Dev] Python 3.x and bytes [Python-Dev] Python 3.x and bytes"Martin v. Löwis" martin at v.loewis.de
Wed May 18 22:06:26 CEST 2011
> Here's another thought, that perhaps is not backwards-incompatible...
> 
> some_var[3] == b'd'
> 
> At some point, the bytes class' __eq__ will be called -- is there a
> reason why we cannot have
> 
> 1) a check to see if the bytes instance is length 1
> 2) a check to see if
>    i) the other object is an int, and
>    2) 0 <= other_obj < 256
> 3) if 1 and 2, make the comparison instead of returning NotImplemented?

Immutable objects that compare equal should hash equal;
so we would also have to change the hashing of byte strings. Not sure
whether that, in turn, has undesirable consequences.

In addition, equality should be transitive, so b'A' == 65.0.

Regards,
Martin
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4