In article <BANLkTikhNDSPPdeOce5KF18G+vbjcwqwEw at mail.gmail.com>, Tarek Ziadé <ziade.tarek at gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 1:25 AM, Ned Deily <nad at acm.org> wrote: > > Just to be clear: what about for the build of the interpreter itself, > > i.e. its setup.py for the standard library extension modules? Will the > > existing distutils code continue to be used for that? [...] > It will remain distutils-based for now. Moving it to packaging is not > our top priority. +1. Thanks! -- Ned Deily, nad at acm.org
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4