On Fri, 06 May 2011 13:28:11 +1200 Greg Ewing <greg.ewing at canterbury.ac.nz> wrote: > Amaury Forgeot d'Arc wrote [concerning the Doc/data/refcounts.dat file]: > > > This is not always true, for example when the item is already present > > in the dict. > > It's not important to know what the function does to the object, > > Only the action on the reference is relevant. > > Yes, that's the whole point. When using a functon, > what you need to know is whether it borrows or steals > a reference. Doesn't "borrow" mean the same as "steal" in that context? If an API borrows a reference, I expect it to take it from me. Regards Antoine.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4