On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 11:06, anatoly techtonik <techtonik at gmail.com> wrote: > On Sun, May 1, 2011 at 7:31 PM, Georg Brandl <g.brandl at gmx.net> wrote: > > On 30.04.2011 16:53, anatoly techtonik wrote: > >> On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 4:37 AM, R. David Murray <rdmurray at bitdance.com> > wrote: > >>> > >>> The hardest part is debugging the TAL when you make a mistake, but > >>> even that isn't a whole lot worse than any other templating language. > >> > >> How much in % is it worse than Django templating language? > > > > I'm just guessing here, but I'd say 47.256 %. > > That means switching to Django templates will make Roundup design > plumbing work 47.256% more attractive for potential contributors. What if these "potential contributors" never surface? Then we've made a 47.256% change in attractiveness, which is a 1423.843% waste of time. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20110502/dcc35554/attachment.html>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4