Le jeudi 31 mars 2011 à 23:48 +1000, Nick Coghlan a écrit : > On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 10:16 PM, Antoine Pitrou <solipsis at pitrou.net> wrote: > > It would be nice if someone with UI design experience was interested in > > maintaining/improving the tracker. > > The challenge is the same as with any UI designer involvement in open > source stuff though: they really need to be given the freedom to do > proper workflow analysis and come up with something that *works*, but > in practice things tend to get derailed into endless bikeshed > arguments, since *everyone* has an opinion on the UI design of the > tools they have to use. Well, obviously they have, since they are users and are directly impacted by any changes. The line this draws is between clean-sheet design and iterative improvement. Clearly it would be difficult to try to sell us a wholesale change in how the issue tracker organizes things. (AFAIK, Roundup itself comes from a platonic, clean-sheet design of an ideal bug tracker: we had to customize it a lot) Regards Antoine.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4