On Wed, 30 Mar 2011 12:17:05 +1100 Mark Hammond <mhammond at skippinet.com.au> wrote: > On 30/03/2011 12:09 PM, R. David Murray wrote: > > On Wed, 30 Mar 2011 11:11:45 +1100, Mark Hammond<mhammond at skippinet.com.au> wrote: > >> I'm wondering if it is a reasonable idea to have .hgignore exclude all > >> files from 'Lib/site-packages' and 'Scripts'? As I install packages > >> into my source builds, a 'hg status' lists *many* files in both those > >> directories forcing me to scroll up a number of pages to see files which > >> have actually changed. > > > > I hardly ever install things into my source build. The first time I've > > done that, in fact, was to run coverage. > > Windows doesn't really have an install process integrated into the > build, so it is probably fairly common there. > > > The solution is to add such > > directories and/or files to your personal ignore list See the 'ignore' > > entry under 'ui' in the hgrc documentation. > > Yeah - but I was wondering if it could be made more convenient by > default given the downside seems quite small... I don't see any downside myself. Regards Antoine.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4