On 28 March 2011 22:29, Terry Reedy <tjreedy at udel.edu> wrote: > From what you write, it seems that mq is actually an unordered patch set, > not a queue (in the FIFO) sense. (Or do you have to commit and remove in > FIFO order?) Why the confusing mislabel, if indeed I understood correctly? It's a queue (FIFO). Sorry if my description was misleading - I don't use mq much myself. (There are ways of reordering patches, but that's advanced use of an already-advanced feature...) Paul.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4