On 3/28/2011 6:13 AM, Paul Moore wrote: > This philosophy is essentially what the "mq" extension to Mercurial > tries to capture. In mq, you maintain a series of patches "on top of" > your repository, amending, refining and rebasing them as you wish > until they are ready to commit, at which time you take them off the > patch queue and convert them into final commits in the repository. From what you write, it seems that mq is actually an unordered patch set, not a queue (in the FIFO) sense. (Or do you have to commit and remove in FIFO order?) Why the confusing mislabel, if indeed I understood correctly? -- Terry Jan Reedy
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4