On 3/27/2011 2:13 PM, Eugene Toder wrote: >> I'm not disputing that, and I understand that my current choice of mail >> reader limits me. I was just asking if it would be possible (read: fairly >> easy) to only generate utf-8 when it was necessary. > > Isn't utf-8 itself same as ascii where no non-ascii symbols are used? Yes, except for the content encoding header. Any mail reader today should know that and at least replace any non-ascii bytes (very rare in checkin messages) with some symbol and continue, rather than crash. -- Terry Jan Reedy
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4