Am 25.03.2011 10:24, schrieb Stefan Behnel: > "Martin v. Löwis", 25.03.2011 07:59: >>> Is there a bug somewhere, or do I misunderstood something important? >> >> Module unloading is simply not implemented, and would be very difficult >> to implement. > > Are you saying that because objects instantiated from a module do not > normally keep a reference to it to keep it alive? No, I'm saying that there is no support whatsoever to unload the shared library of the extension module when the extension module would no longer be used. Regards, Martin
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4