RetroSearch Browse

Fri Mar 25 00:21:25 CET 2011 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2011-March/110045.html

Le jeudi 24 mars 2011 à 13:22 +0100, M.-A. Lemburg a écrit :
> BTW: Why do you think that %.100s is not supported in
> PyErr_Format() in Python 2.x ? PyString_FromFormatV()
> does support this. The change to use Unicode error strings
> introduced the problem, since PyUnicode_FromFormatV() for
> some reason ignores the precision (which is shouldn't).

Oh... You are right, it is a regression in Python 3. We started to write
unit tests for PyBytes_FromFormat() and PyUnicode_FromFormat(), I hope
that they will improve the situation.

> That said, it's a good idea to add the #7330 fix
> to at least Python 2.7 as well, since ignoring the precision
> is definitely a bug. It may even be security relevant, since
> it could be used for DOS attacks on servers (e.g. causing them
> to write huge strings to log files instead of just a few
> hundreds bytes per message), so may even need to go into Python 2.6.

Python 2 is not affected because PyErr_Format() uses
PyString_FromFormatV() which supports precision for %s format (e.g.
%.100s truncate the string to 100 bytes).

Do you think that Python 3.1-3.3 should be fixed?

Let's begin by closing #10833 as invalid.

Victor

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2011-March/110045.html below:

[Python-Dev] Replace useless %.100s by %s in PyErr_Format()