> I would like to replace %.100s because there are no more reason to > truncate strings to an arbitrary length. I agree with MAL. It protects against cases with ridiculously long parameters - say, you have a string with 1GB. You *want* to truncate bogus text. Regards, Martin
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4