On 03/21/2011 11:35 PM, "Martin v. Löwis" wrote: > > If people then complain about too much fine-grainedness, we could > tighten it again. > Hi to all for the first time, I'm new to this list. First of all I would like to thank all you for the great software and ideas you produce. I found this thread of discussion interesting and well, it's just an idea: Why not to TAG the final feature ? May be in a “parsable”, standard form ? Ej: >> hg tag -m “Feature : Templates for code generation, status: Done” So If one doesn't want to see the “in between”, a tag filter can be applied, or something similar … Of course there are 2 types of info here: “private” and “public” and well, like in python, use some kind of “underline” for private names here (def _do_my_thing(self): pass) May be can be somehow automated … Cheers / Saludos francis
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4