A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2011-March/109849.html below:

[Python-Dev] Hg: inter-branch workflow

[Python-Dev] Hg: inter-branch workflow [Python-Dev] Hg: inter-branch workflowNick Coghlan ncoghlan at gmail.com
Tue Mar 22 22:40:49 CET 2011
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 12:28 AM, Barry Warsaw <barry at python.org> wrote:
>>Ah. We don't support this kind of development - no new named branches
>>are allowed in the central repository.
>
> It does sound like that restriction is a source of friction for us.

I'd like to hold off on abandoning it, though. All the issues we
currently have with applying patches wouldn't magically go away if
those changes were simple merges from named branches instead. You also
create a risk of mistakes like branching from default for a bug fix,
then merging your bug fix branch into 3.1.

Cheers,
Nick.

-- 
Nick Coghlan   |   ncoghlan at gmail.com   |   Brisbane, Australia
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4