On 22 March 2011 20:44, Dirkjan Ochtman <dirkjan at ochtman.nl> wrote: > The right solution here is to use different clones for different > projects/areas. I'm not trolling here, just trying to learn something about Mercurial. Would having separate clones for the various releases (2.7, 3.1, 3.2, ...) rather than named branches, reduce contention? I imagine it would make porting patches between versions harder, on the other hand...? Paul.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4