On Mar 22, 2011, at 07:51 AM, Martin v. Löwis wrote: >Am 22.03.2011 02:02, schrieb Eugene Toder: >>> Not if the changes you want to suppress are actually also on the same >>> branch as the one whose mainline you are trying to see (which they >>> typically are, with the branch typically being "default"). >> >> Right, that would amount to not using named branches. But if you >> develop on a named feature-branch and merge into "default" when ready >> your local history is easy to filter-out without rebasing or >> collapsing. > >Ah. We don't support this kind of development - no new named branches >are allowed in the central repository. It does sound like that restriction is a source of friction for us. -Barry -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 836 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20110322/88215025/attachment.pgp>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4