RetroSearch Browse

Tue Mar 22 08:47:40 CET 2011 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2011-March/109787.html

"Martin v. Löwis" writes:
 > Am 22.03.2011 02:02, schrieb Eugene Toder:
 > >> Not if the changes you want to suppress are actually also on the same
 > >> branch as the one whose mainline you are trying to see (which they
 > >> typically are, with the branch typically being "default").
 > >
 > > Right, that would amount to not using named branches. But if you
 > > develop on a named feature-branch and merge into "default" when ready
 > > your local history is easy to filter-out without rebasing or
 > > collapsing.
 > 
 > Ah. We don't support this kind of development - no new named branches
 > are allowed in the central repository.

Maybe it would be possible to allow *closed* named branches, which
would support such filtering.

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2011-March/109787.html below:

[Python-Dev] Hg: inter-branch workflow