Am 22.03.2011 02:02, schrieb Eugene Toder: >> Not if the changes you want to suppress are actually also on the same >> branch as the one whose mainline you are trying to see (which they >> typically are, with the branch typically being "default"). > > Right, that would amount to not using named branches. But if you > develop on a named feature-branch and merge into "default" when ready > your local history is easy to filter-out without rebasing or > collapsing. Ah. We don't support this kind of development - no new named branches are allowed in the central repository. Regards, Martin
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4