> Not if the changes you want to suppress are actually also on the same > branch as the one whose mainline you are trying to see (which they > typically are, with the branch typically being "default"). Right, that would amount to not using named branches. But if you develop on a named feature-branch and merge into "default" when ready your local history is easy to filter-out without rebasing or collapsing. Eugene
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4