On Mon, 21 Mar 2011 23:35:30 +0100 "Martin v. Löwis" <martin at v.loewis.de> wrote: > > Having to be nitpicking here "not how you (Antoine) want us to work". > "We" aren't using mercurial long enough to make such a statement. Well, being directive and giving strong workflow indications seems to be what many people are expecting of "us" (aka Georg, I, and the few other people involved in writing the hg version of the devguide). > I still propose to loosen this restriction, and go with that for a > while. Perhaps improve the email hook to give more condensed reports. The buildbot hook must then also be changed to only consider the changegroup heads. It should be quite simple except that modified files must be computed accross the whole bunch of ancestor changsets in the changegroup (should be doable in the same step that computes the heads). Both the hooks and the devguide are modifiable by anyone (*), of course. (*) with push access Regards Antoine.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4