On Mon, 21 Mar 2011 16:33:31 -0400 Barry Warsaw <barry at python.org> wrote: > Each of those would be > represented by a changeset in my local line of development, and by a side > branch in the mainline DAG once my merge is completed. You might want to dig > into that sideline to see if indeed I addressed the issues in your second > review of my code. If we have to manually collapse changesets at feature > branch merge time, you can't do that. I'd rather take a look at the final aggregate patch to see if it looks correct, actually. It's easy to have incremental changes which look good but lead to a questionable patch in the end. Better to review it in aggregate, IMO. Regards Antoine.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4