A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2011-March/109714.html below:

[Python-Dev] Hg: inter-branch workflow

[Python-Dev] Hg: inter-branch workflow [Python-Dev] Hg: inter-branch workflowBarry Warsaw barry at python.org
Mon Mar 21 21:19:01 CET 2011
On Mar 21, 2011, at 11:56 AM, Daniel Stutzbach wrote:

>Keeping the repository clean makes it easier to use a bisection search to
>hunt down the introduction of a bug.  If  every developer's intermediate
>commits make it into the main repository, it's hard to go back to an older
>revision to test something, because many of the older revisions will be
>broken in some way.

So maybe this gets at my earlier question about rebase being cultural
vs. technology, and the response about bzr having a strong sense of mainline
where hg doesn't.

I don't use the bzr-bisect plugin too much, but I think by default it only
follows commits on the main line, unless a bisect point is identified within a
merge (i.e. side) line.  So again, those merged intermediate changes are
mostly ignored until they're needed.

-Barry

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20110321/60eeb776/attachment.pgp>
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4