On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 8:38 AM, Antoine Pitrou <solipsis at pitrou.net> wrote: > We cannot emulate "svnmerge" for porting between branches, though - and > I doubt bzr can do it. That's because merges in common DVCSes are based > on the DAG, while svnmerge is a prettily ad-hoc free-form thing. The equivalent way to how we had been using svnmerge would be to use hg transplant to move patches between branches (and never merging the branches). Conversely, the current hg workflow would be similar to committing changes to the earliest applicable svn branch, then doing a full svnmerge to later branches. -- Daniel Stutzbach -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20110321/4f5f7b53/attachment.html>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4