Stefan Behnel, 21.03.2011 11:58: > Guido van Rossum, 21.03.2011 03:46: >> Have you tried replacing selected stdlib modules with their >> Cython-optimized equivalents in some of the NumPy/SciPy distros? (E.g. >> what about Enthought's Python distros?) Depending on how well that >> goes I might warm up to Cython more! > > Hmm, I hadn't heard about that before. I'll ask on our mailing list if > anyone's aware of them. I doubt that the stdlib participates in the > critical parts of scientific computation code. Maybe alternative CSV > parsers or something like that, but I'd be surprised if they were > compatible with what's in the stdlib. Sorry, I misread your statement above. You were actually proposing to let us work on the existing stdlib modules, and then to get other, already Cython-enabled distributions to ship Cython compiled stdlib modules for testing. Yes, I think this is a good idea. Their entry level for using Cython at build time will be much lower than for general CPython. Would you say it's worth a GSoC project to get some of the Python stdlib modules compiled and/or some of the C modules rewritten in Cython? The Cython project would surely provide collective help through its user mailing list, code review, etc. Stefan
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4