On Mar 21, 2011, at 06:14 AM, skip at pobox.com wrote: >It, however requires every developer to become facile, if not expert, with >the ins and outs of the Python/Mercurial workflow. This discourages casual >or intermittent contributions. My main contribution to the Python codebase >over the past couple years has been to intercept trivial "bug reports" sent >to the webmaster address calling out typos in the documentation or the >website. Handling such reports was trivial with Subversion. Update, edit, >check in. That is no longer the case with Mercurial. (And for the website >will no longer be the case in the fairly near future if I understand >correctly.) > >I believe it runs counter to the professed intention of the switch away from >a centralized version control system, to make it easier for more people to >contribute to Python. It certainly seems harder for this old dog. Does Mercurial have a way of acting like a centralized vcs to the end user, the way Bazaar does? IOW, if Skip or others were more comfortable with a centralized workflow (which is entirely valid imo), can they set up their local workspace to enable that mode of operation? If so, the devguide could describe that as a transitional step from the old svn way of doing things. -Barry -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 836 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20110321/9f88cd1b/attachment.pgp>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4