On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 17:39, Georg Brandl <g.brandl at gmx.net> wrote: > The reason why rebasing is not universally applied is that the > rebased changesets are different from the original ones (therefore > I wrote A' and B') -- even if the diff is the same, the parents > are not, and therefore the changeset id (hash) changes. This is > called "changing history", and frowned upon by purists. In reality > it works fine if you know the limits: It's frowned upon by more than just purists, and it works "in reality" as fine as handing out your creditcard and personal information over the internet; you can't always tell the result is bad, and it can be very painful finding out. Jaywalking-and-unprotected-sex-metaphors-available-on-demand'ly y'rs, -- Thomas Wouters <thomas at python.org> Hi! I'm a .signature virus! copy me into your .signature file to help me spread! -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20110320/a6bed8cc/attachment.html>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4