Nick Coghlan, 12.03.2011 12:43: > I posted my rough notes and additional write-ups for Wednesday's VM > summit and Thursday's language summit: > > http://www.boredomandlaziness.org/2011/03/python-vm-summit-rough-notes.html > http://www.boredomandlaziness.org/2011/03/python-vm-summit-somewhat-coherent.html > http://www.boredomandlaziness.org/2011/03/python-language-summit-rough-notes.html > http://www.boredomandlaziness.org/2011/03/python-language-summit-highlights.html It appears that there has been little mention of Cython at the summit, despite of the speed of CPython being a major topic, according to the notes. I can see several areas where Cython could help in speeding up core CPython, one of the most obvious being compilation of standard library modules, and JIT-like compilation of Python modules at import time. Nick mentioned that there was a discussion of making C-only modules available as alternative Python implementations. I'd like to suggest the opposite as well: make pure Python stdlib modules optionally compilable to fast C code using Cython. The obvious advantages are a) speed and b) a single code base for both Python and C modules. Stefan
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4