RetroSearch Browse

Thu Mar 17 16:00:50 CET 2011 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2011-March/109449.html

On Thu, 17 Mar 2011 10:50:24 -0400
"R. David Murray" <rdmurray at bitdance.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 17 Mar 2011 14:33:00 +0100, Antoine Pitrou <solipsis at pitrou.net> wrote:
> > On Thu, 17 Mar 2011 09:24:26 -0400
> > "R. David Murray" <rdmurray at bitdance.com> wrote:
> > > 
> > > It would be great if rebase did work with share, that would make a
> > > push race basically a non-issue for me.
> > 
> > rebase as well as strip destroy some history, meaning some of your
> > shared clones may end up having their working copy based on a
> > non-existent changeset. I'm not sure why rebase would be worse that
> > strip in that regard, though.
> 
> So maybe the problem was that I tried hg pull --rebase, and that mucked
> with the checkout.

Can't you just fix the checkout then, using "hg up" or even "hg up -C"?
(note: I'm not a rebase expert)

Regards

Antoine.

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2011-March/109449.html below:

[Python-Dev] Hg: inter-branch workflow