On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 07:41, Jesus Cea <jcea at jcea.es> wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 17/03/11 13:35, Jesus Cea wrote: > > Tonight I was thinking about doing a merge inside the branch, to solve > > the "+1 branch". Something like transforming: > > Another thing I was thinking about tonight was... dropping the "+1 head" > banning. Embrace it. Embrace the mercurial way completely. > > Each developer is responsible of merging HIS heads. If somebody > "forgets", nothing wrong will happens. And no patch is left behind, > because you can see unmerged patches with "hg heads", and bug their owners. That just makes more work. 1. I, being new to hg, might not realize my error and just think I'm done. I move on with life. 2. Someone has to notice the additional head then contact me. 3. Now I have to go back and figure out not only what I did wrong, but what I have to do to correct it. In the end, yes, it's my problem, but just because you can shoot yourself in the foot doesn't mean we need to let people do it. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20110317/b7a17b20/attachment.html>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4